Goldman Sachs pushes back on pessimism as Eternal rebounds after prolonged selloff
Shares of Eternal rose sharply after Goldman Sachs reiterated its buy rating, arguing that market pessimism has overshot fundamentals. The rebound comes after months of underperformance driven by competition and quick commerce slowdown concerns.
By Finblage Editorial Desk
12:21 pm
9 January 2026
Eternal’s stock staged a notable rebound in Friday’s session after global investment bank Goldman Sachs reiterated its positive stance, pushing back against what it described as excessive bearishness priced into the shares. The move marks a sentiment shift for a stock that has struggled to keep pace with broader markets in recent months.
Over the past three months, Eternal has been a clear underperformer. The stock has declined roughly 17 percent during this period, even as benchmark indices have risen about 3 percent. This divergence reflects growing investor unease around India’s online food delivery and quick-commerce space, where competition has intensified and growth expectations have moderated.
Concerns around margin sustainability, rising delivery costs, and aggressive discounting in quick commerce weighed heavily on Eternal’s valuation through the October–December quarter. As a result, the stock entered 2026 with sentiment firmly on the defensive, despite its leadership position across food delivery and instant grocery segments.
On Friday, Eternal shares rose more than 3 percent in intraday trade after Goldman Sachs reiterated its “buy” rating. On the National Stock Exchange, the stock climbed as much as 3.3 percent to an intraday high of ₹292.90, marking its third consecutive session of gains.
The immediate trigger was Goldman Sachs’ assessment that the market is overstating the downside risks. The brokerage said it “disagrees with the extent of bearishness” currently reflected in the stock price, even as it marginally trimmed its target price to ₹375 from ₹390 earlier. Despite the cut, the revised target still implies meaningful upside from current levels.
Goldman’s view matters because it challenges the prevailing narrative around Eternal at a time when investor confidence is fragile. According to the brokerage, the sharp 14.6 percent sell-off in the stock during the October–December period - compared with a 6.2 percent gain in the Nifty 50 - was driven largely by fears of rising competition and an anticipated slowdown in quick commerce demand.
While these risks are real, Goldman’s note suggests that they may already be more than reflected in valuations. In effect, the brokerage is arguing that downside scenarios have been front-loaded into the stock price, leaving room for recovery if execution remains stable.
Eternal is the parent company of Zomato and quick-commerce platform Blinkit, giving it exposure to two highly competitive but structurally growing digital consumption segments. While food delivery has matured, quick commerce remains an evolving market where profitability timelines are still being reassessed by investors.
This dual exposure has become a double-edged sword. On one hand, it provides long-term optionality. On the other, it amplifies concerns when growth assumptions are questioned, as seen in recent quarters.
Goldman Sachs’ reiteration of its buy call - despite trimming the target price - signals confidence in Eternal’s medium-term business fundamentals rather than near-term momentum. The brokerage’s language indicates discomfort with how far sentiment has swung negative, especially relative to the broader market.
This stands in contrast to the market’s recent behaviour, where investors have rotated away from platform-based consumer tech stocks toward more predictable earnings plays.
For Indian markets, Eternal’s rebound may offer early signals of bottoming in select internet and platform stocks that have corrected sharply without a corresponding collapse in underlying demand. If the stock stabilises, it could encourage selective re-entry into the broader consumer internet space.
At a sector level, the commentary highlights a growing divide between perception and pricing in quick commerce. While competition remains intense, expectations of a sharp demand slowdown may prove too conservative if consumption patterns hold up in urban India.
Sources & Disclaimer
This article is compiled from publicly available information, including company disclosures, stock exchange filings, regulatory announcements, and reports from global and domestic financial publications. The content has been editorially reviewed and enhanced by the Finblage Editorial Desk for clarity and investor awareness purposes only.
All information provided on Finblage is strictly for educational and informational use and should not be considered as financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Readers are advised to conduct their own independent research and consult a certified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Finblage shall not be held responsible for any losses arising from the use of information published on this website.
_edited.png)





